Wednesday, 15 February 2017

Fairy liquid advert analysis

Fairy liquid has been a household product in British homes for many decades, its a well trusted brand and has been advertising to our homes since the 1960s, since then there adverts have changed dramatically, for a long period of time fairy liquid has had a running theme of a mother and daughter, this stock character theme has been carried out even today, the adverts display a close relationship in all their adverts usually a parent and child, this displays trust and relate ability to the audience. 





The stereotypical advert from the 60s- 90s would be a white mother and her daughter, here is an example of that very type of advert, the stereotypical story line over all these years would be the daughter asking her mother what the product is, the mother would list all of the benefits and the USP of the product which back then was how soft it made your hands. this is a great way to convey the benefits of the product to the viewing audience also. 

In 2000 fairly liquid released a new advert that displayed a young black mother and her son, this is something fairy had never done before, this was part of their effort to combat the problems they may face with race and ethnicity, it shows diversity within there product and how there product is made for everyone. this successful combats there issues with race and sexism and gives a clear indication of how the world is changing, compared to older adverts they have battled the typical gender roles within there advertisement that was a theme of several decades. 

With this advert of the black woman and her son, as well as a rebrand of characters and stock roles, the USP of the complete product has changed also, fairly liquid is entering a new world of own brands and low price products which means there selling point of soft hands was not cutting it, the audience wanted long lasting and value for money, in 2000 there USP changed to how long the fairly liquid lasts, "it lasts twice as long". making this change was vital to the popularity of the well known brand. 

looking at there most recent advert which was from 2015 its clear that the roles have changed once again, the role has been stereotypically a mother and child, the ole of the child has changed gender however it has been stereotypical of a mother and child, in this advert there is both parents however the father takes dominance. the story line is the same as all the other liquid adverts, its were the child will ask a statement, in this case the child wants to use the bottle for a spaceship and he asks his dad why its taking so long to use, the dad goes on to explain the USP of the product and how its last so good and the great value it has. the boy has a calendar that shows all the days the bottle lasts emphasizing its great value to the audience.  

Although the story may be the same the characters are not, their is a mother involved however she is shadowed in the background, this advert could be seen as sexist and all she does in the advert is wash up, whilst the dad reads his news paper. The dad also does washing up, this could be fairy way of trying to wash that sexism out of the advert. This advert is seen in a very traditional family home, maybe one of the past. If i was to compare this video to Vladimir Propps theory of characters i would say that the boy (main character) could be seen as the hero, he has something to focus on and work towards, he longs for the fairly liquid bottle and isn't going to stop till he gets it, the bottle could be a symbol of a princess or prize etc. In the end the child gets the bottle and everything ends happy, just like Propps theory would suggest. 

I think that you could relate most of the adverts over the decades to Todorovs five stages, all of the adverts start with the equilibrium, this would be the boy playing on the scooter in one advert, or the child and mother playing in the earlier adverts, though in the adverts there is usually an issue, which would be the disruption in his theory, this could be the dirty plates, or the young boy not able to get his bottle to make his spaceship, theres that sense of hardship or let down. 

it may then lead to the fourth point of the advert, the fairy liquid may be finished and then boy can then begin to build his ship, or it may be the mother finds the fairy liquid and can begin cleaning the plates. this points creates an answer to the question. this then leads on to the last point where the dishes are cleaned and its the end to a happy tory, and the boy has finally made his spaceship, everyone is then happy because of that one product, it proves the product can create happiness and has divers uses. 


Theorist

Vladimir Propp

Vladimir propp was a literary critic and a scholar who founded the theory that in every narrative structure there would be certain types of characters, he builds a character profile for each type that he identified. His theory influenced many different filmmakers from writing and producing successful and effective narratives. Propp also claimed that fairy tales follow a specific narrative structure.

Vladimir prop was Russian and he analysed many of his country’s folk tales, within this he identified key themes, he broke down the different stories into morphemes, these are analysable chunks of the tales, he also identified 31 narratemes, these are narrative units. “Propp has been both lauded for his structural approach and criticized for his lack of sensitivity to subtle story elements such as mood and deeper context.”

Here are the 31 narrative elements that propp identified, he believes that in all narratives there is this structure, it would have the same stereotypical elements and characters in the story. He would identify that in every production there would be a relationship etc.

1st Sphere: Introduction
Steps 1 to 7 introduces the situation and most of the main characters, setting the scene for subsequent adventure.
2nd Sphere: The Body of the story
The main story starts here and extends to the departure of the hero on the main quest.
3rd Sphere: The Donor Sequence
In the third sphere, the hero goes in search of a method by which the solution may be reached, gaining the magical agent from the Donor. Note that this in itself may be a complete story.
4th Sphere: The Hero’s return
In the final (and often optional) phase of the storyline, the hero returns home, hopefully uneventfully and to a hero's welcome, although this may not always be the case.







Tzvetan Todorov              

Tzvetan Todorov was a French-Bulgarian historian, philosopher, structuralist, literary critic, socialist and essayist. Through his life he published many essays and books all of these products had influence in anthropologysociologysemioticsliterary theorythought history and culture theory.

In 1969 todorov produced a theory, this theory was a theory about narrative structure, he believed that he could apply this theory to any film. He strongly believed that every film followed the same narrative structure. The structure of the film all went through stages called equilibrium, disequilibrium, acknowledgement, solving and again equilibrium.





                            There are five stages the narrative can progress through:
1. A state of equilibrium (All is as it should be.)
2. A disruption of that order by an event.
3. A recognition that the disorder has occurred.
4. An attempt to repair the damage of the disruption.
5. A return or restoration of a NEW equilibrium






Levi strauss
“Claude Levi-Strauss (1908-2009) is one of France’s foremost thinkers of the 20th century. The celebrated philosopher and anthropologist is one of the key figures of structuralism and is along with Franz Boas and James George Frazer often referred to as the “father of modern anthropology” as he dramatically changed the Western perception of culture and civilisation.”


strauss studied hundreds of legends and myths from all around the world from all different cultures, from all of his research he found that we as humans make sense of the world, people and different events by seeing and using binary opposites. He’s main theory was that all narratives will be arranged around the conflict of binary opposites.


In the mid 20th century, the 2 major thinkers for Europe, strauss and Roland Barthes, came together and they researched into the way we understand different words, it wasn’t the meaning of the words it was the understanding of the difference of the word and its opposite, this would be the words binary opposite. After long researching the pair discovered that words act simply as a symbol for society’s ideas and the relationship of the world rather than the fixed meaning

Roland Barthes

Roland Barthes was a French literary theorist, philosopher, critic and semiotician, he explored a diverse range of fields and have a massive impact even today. Roland discovered a theory called codes theory, Roland described a text as a “galaxy of signifiers, not a structure of signified, what Barthes meant by this is the meaning never stops evolving, its like a thread that needs unraveling, you can continue to unravel the narrative from a different angle and create an entirely different meaning.

Barthes narrowed down the text into 5 different codes which would be found into any narrative.

 The hermeneutic code (the voice of the truth)

This is when the story avoids telling the truth, it will purposely hide some of the facts, this is so they can drop clues through the story, this helps create tension and mystery through the story.

The enigma, proairetic code (empirical voice)

The way the tension is built up and the audience is left guessing what is going to happen, this would usually cause suspense and tension.

The symbolic code (the voice of symbols)

This code is similar to semantic code, however this code is on a wider scale, this code organizes semantic meanings into broader and deeper sets of antithesis, where new meanings arises out opposing and conflict ideas, basically the binary opposite ideas.

The cultural code (voice of science)
This code would look more in depth at the audiences cultural knowledge, morality and ideology.